Aceable Portfolio Brands

Creating a Flexible Email System at Scale

2024-2025

Branding
Design System
Email Design

Background

In late 2024, Aceable leadership identified a major issue for the brand: email design. Email drove a significant share of outreach and enrollments for Aceable, AceableAgent, PrepAgent, iDriveSafely, and DriversEd.com… yet our branding was incredibly lackluster. Each brand lacked consistency, clarity, and brand distinction.

There was no dedicated email designer, and I was balancing several other product initiatives. The ask was clear: improve quality across five brands quickly and sustainably. Within two weeks, I created a lightweight email design system with defined brand standards, modular layouts, and reusable components.

Objectives

Build a Clear, Usable System

Calling it a full “design system” might be generous, but we needed clear guidelines the email team could actually follow. The goal was structure, not theory. We needed clear layout rules, defined hierarchy, intentional color usage, and modular components to eliminate guesswork.

Create Distinct Identities for Each Brand

This was tricky given the quick turnaround. I wanted each brand to feel distinct, not SO distinct that hyper-specific assets that would be required for every email. The system needed to create separation, but still be flexible and repeatable.

It also needed to be simple. Adding unnecessary flair to emails is not only distracting for users, but also risky when non-designers try to replicate the styles. With limited resources, simplicity was essential, reducing the need for design oversight on every send.

Building a Mini Design System at Scale

Similar to CORE, each brand follows an identical design system structure while maintaining its own personality. This makes it easy for designers in Figma, as variables allow seamless switching from brand to brand. It also keeps execution simple and efficient for everyone involved, especially our email marketing team.

You’ll notice each brand uses a different typeface in email. This is intentional, as email clients have limited font support. Rather than risk brand fonts failing to load, we selected the closest reliable match to ensure consistent rendering across platforms.

Core Components

As you can see below, our section components are nothing crazy – just enough to get the message across, while also allowing for creativity through embedded imagery.

Creating Distinct Brand Identities

With the system established, I turned to imagery — a consistent weak point in our emails. Each brand needed strong differentiation, but it also had to be practical; we simply didn’t have the bandwidth for time-intensive, custom assets. The solution was a focused set of guidelines that balanced uniqueness with efficiency.

The Result

Before revealing final designs, it’s important to look back at our starting point. Below are a few legacy email templates that were frequently used by the Email team.

A sample of emails for each brand is shown below. While I’m unable to share specific performance metrics, each brand saw meaningful improvements in email KPIs.